I think the old apartment owners should feel deeply regretful for the new buildings' utility rate(unluckily I'm living in some new flats....>=<)  The old house we owned(Lai Sing Court(rebuilt already) claims to be 1200 sq ft & people believe so(actual size id 980 or 1000sq ft I don't even remember)  but it's big the living room, the kitchen you can put a small dining table with 3 reasonable bedrooms that you can put the beds & closets without much thinking).  After renovation, the new building is called Serenade(Tai Hang Rd), the house claims to be 1035sq ft but looks like 700sq ft with also 3 bedrooms but a humble living room, small narrow kitchen, a maid's room like you are keeping a dog but not human!)  Oh my goodness, sometimes I wonder the potential for this kind of new building, we sold it out right away!

On the contrary, when you check old building that has 30 yrs history at least(Braemar Hill Mansions, Tai Koo Shing), why is it so old & yet the selling price is breaking its own record day after day??  I think location & utility rate also matters, you just feel easier to put all kinds of layout & furniture the way you wanted in old buildings.  And as you can see, the price is getting stronger & stronger!!!

在新制度下，好多以前豪稱所謂千尺豪宅，其實只得六七百尺，現在直接現晒型，小一個位好影響面子

如果有朋友問你間屋幾大，唔知點答?  存在面子、心理因素，如一千尺變七百尺，七百尺變五百尺，五百尺變四百尺

實用面積計呎價 = 白花花銀子 / 實用面積, (即我花了銀子買咗我的地方)

咁, 樓下大堂, 電梯大堂, 垃圾房, 電錶房, 電話機房, 天台水箱, ... 會所等等,  會係邊個俾錢?

肯定有人要俾錢, 但又唔會係發展商, 咁咪又即係我俾錢.

即係, 我俾嗰啲白花花銀子, 部份要支付樓下大堂, 電梯大堂, 垃圾房, 電錶房, 電話機房, 天台水箱, ... 會所等等.

咁到底我的實用面積計呎價係幾多? 邊個可以話我知?

實用面積係乜野?  建築面積係乜野?

實用面積呎價係乜野? 建築面積呎價係乜野?

係幻覺?

建築面積，使買家有錯覺 ...

實用面積呎價，使買家更有錯覺 (尤其係升市時)

大家重回那些年：＂６０＂年代吧，９５％實用率，但：

沒有電梯及大堂，沒有會所及泳池，沒有花園及車場，更沒有走廊及垃圾房

只有公家大閘門常開，只有看更坐門口，只有路邊等錶位，更要垃圾放門口！！

專貴既私樓準買家，你可以接受嗎！？。。。。。市場上是有很多供選擇的。

一分錢，一分貨。要做上等人，卻付下等價。可以嗎！？

舊樓: 愉景灣