|
1. 80後的蟻民 2012-04-18 12:24:52 |
|
人道立場, 人地大肚唔俾人生, 係咪有問題
你可以無香港居留權, 但唔可以拒絕接收囉我認為
如果外傭有左如何 ?
如果外國人有左如何 ?
根本一直大家既共識就係唔應該俾佢享有福利而已 |
|
2. BB 2012-04-18 12:31:53 |
|
|
|
3. 朕有辦法 2012-04-18 12:46:25 |
|
「強政勵治」。。。。 朕一登位，就要整頓垃圾會，你班狀棍專搞亂港祸民！ 西廠已經部署好，我登位之日，就係你班亂黨既末日！ |
|
4. B 仔媽咪 2012-04-18 13:25:59 |
|
將香港比如你的家, 你的住所, 地方有限, 收留親朋好友住一段時間無問題, 如果佢地想雀巢鳩佔, 一定要同佢死過,
|
|
5. St. Andrew's 2012-04-18 13:28:07 |
|
為了把弯的木條扳正，有時須要把木條弯向另一方 --- 就是 “矯枉過正” 的意思 ! 我看見了CY 已經針對性地 回應香港目下的各種社會不公平、不公義現象 : - 打 “官商勾結” - 打 “地產霸權” - 打 “雙非產子” 當然這些社會不公平、不公義現象不會一夜間消失；但總得為社會稍舒民怨民愤。也總比 BT 政府 “隻眼開 隻眼閉 ” “不干預” 的政策聰明，起碼政府表態 Do Something。 |
|
6. CC 2012-04-18 13:37:08 |
|
公屋富户擁有私樓問題己多年,若政府强制執行,只會令公屋富户將手持私樓於市場放售,繼續住公屋,手持現金,由於手持是中小形單位,短時間會多幾萬個中小單位供應,也可令中小形單位價位回落,對上車客是好事,反之對公屋輪候人仕沒有加快因素. |
|
7. 寄生虫 2012-04-18 14:19:28 |
|
要公屋富變賣晒資產去住公屋?  |
|
8. 螢火虫 2012-04-18 14:36:33 |
|
公屋富戶交公屋的"路徑"是"用綠表買居屋"!!! |
|
9. 中間人 2012-04-18 14:48:08 |
|
I agree with #1 too, 只要高調立法不發居港權便可, 到時福利問题便解决，而自自然然也自動减少来港分娩人數, 其實最令人反感是那些中介和衝閘的同胞，至於依足情予提早申請私家醫院的，本人反而覺得問题不大，其實分娩也只是手術的一種，很多人有時也會選擇到外國做手術，可能因某某醫生比較有名，或那醫院設備比較先進，再者，香港的人口老化也是一個大大問題，乘男乘女比例高，己婚的生小孩也是一個起兩個止，再過一兩個十年，問題完全出現就己經很難解决了，希望CY不要為求民望而作出一些短視而害港的政策，而這也是本人最害怕CY的原因，只要香港好，那怕特首又貪又下流.... 房屋增加, 人口减少, 到時何此跌三成, 五成七成都仲得...... |
|
10. 60後港牛 2012-04-18 16:02:30 |
|
同意1, 2楼. |
|
11. someone out there 2012-04-18 16:09:01 |
|
"當然這些社會不公平、不公義現象不會一夜間消失；但總得為社會稍舒民怨民愤。也總比 BT 政府 “隻眼開 隻眼閉 ” “不干預” 的政策聰明，起碼政府表態 Do Something。" Come on. If you really want the government to do something, you first have to do a lot of consultation in HK. Or at least do it in the correct way. I don't know why a lot of people complaint about Donald Tsang's government, indeed he is working quite good, under such a worse situation. If CY only listen to the loudest voice in HK, he may just ruin our future. Take an example, if you don't have to work and still get a good reward, you won't work, will you? The majority ( like those in the EU ) may choose enjoy everyday then work hard everyday. Why bother as you have CY! So, CY should listen to them or not? Personally, I appreciate Donald. |
|
12. 無明 2012-04-18 17:23:53 |
|
|
|
13. 過路人 2012-04-18 17:46:02 |
|
双非是一个人口政策問題. 如果政府有無限資源, 又想港人土生土長. 港人出生正率低. 這是一法. 但是要想深一点, 如這嬰兒在港出生, 他是港人. 他將有權申請其家人, 父母, 兄弟......... 到香港定居及得到港人的福利. 這是是一个嬰兒那麼簡單? 政府是應該用双非嬰兒是配額去優化港人口. 如在科學上, 藝術上, 工業上, ...等. 否則香港只有地產, 金融 和服務業. 我贊成CY 火速處理双非問題. |
|
14. Why Tsang Gov't did nothing 2012-04-18 18:13:16 |
|
Quote No11 "If you really want the government to do something, you first have to do a lot of consultation in HK. " This is exactly Tsang's Gov't did. A lot of consultation, When he received opposite opinion or confronted by adversary. He would put issue aside for futther studies. As result, none of his promises in infra-structure was delivered. His only accomplishment was having the Government headquater built. He did no wrong. He can say "I tried to do a good job, but someone or parties would not let me." Would that be right for a leader? |
|
15. St. Andrew's 2012-04-18 18:37:21 |
|
回11樓 : Of course I can feel that you appreciate BT. I can also feel that you are a guy like to play around “formalities” (all those consultation things, paper work, etc.) But think for day, HK people have lost their patience in these consultations / paper works for the past seven years, eventually you should have seen the fury on property hegemony, collusions, having voiced out from the general public. Can everyone blind to see these social development ? There is nothing wrong with CY who tried to address these issues in first priority. Afterall, CY’s campaign is to make “Changes”. Don't forget that CY also needs to win support from general public. Lets do not mind his intention, but at least he is addressing but not avoiding the issues. That’s what I said “DO SOMETHING”. On a bigger picture, if China thinks that they have lost 15 years time failed in changing the hearts of HK people ; think what China will do in the next 35 years. |
|
16. after 25 march 2012-04-18 21:17:39 |
|
before 25 march, 有個人天天踩CY
after 25 march, 有隻豬日日擦鞋 |
|
17. 雙非 2012-04-18 21:28:49 |
|
（1）雙非不是一個問題，問題是床位太少。（2）香港人均GDP在下跌，因為移民入香港的大多是低下階層。（3）我們應該選較有錢或專業人士移入香港。 |
|
18. Hongkong People 2012-04-18 22:31:59 |
|
Agree with No. 9, 11 and 17.
Without HKID for the new born is a good way to resolve 雙非孕婦 issue. But, zero quota for private hospital is a brutal interfere to the private business. And, it hurts the core value of HK as a free economy. So, govn't should be cautious for that.
Some thoughts and suggestions for the govn't.
Medical service can be a future growth engine for HK other than financial services, accounting services and etc.
Remember that during Mr. Tung's administration, he tried really hard to develop HK as a Hi-tech Port, Chinese Herb Port and etc, etc. But all those port development became an empty claim and white elephant.
But now, medical service is a natural demand owing to poor medical services in our motherland. Any visionary gov't should take the chance and promote HK as a medical port for them. To accomplish that, gov't should quickly push out lands for building hospitals, spare more funds for training medical professionals. Those lands need not to be subsidized and private hospitals shouldn't enjoy any tax benefits as they will know that it is a money driver business. But of course, gov't should impose all kinds of limitations and quotas for their hospitals. They will adjust themselves according to the demand.
Income from the land sales and taxes of private hospitals can then be chipped in to public hospitals to further improve services to serve local citizens.
In case of temporarily shortage of medical professionals, govn't should consider allow certified medical professionals to enter into HK by contract terms.....
HK people always love to compare with Singapore. FYI, Singapore govn't decades ago started promoting their medical services and education services to their rich neighbours i.e. Malaysia and Indonesia. |
|
19. Hongkong People 2012-04-18 22:33:27 |
|
Correction:
gov't SHOULDN'T impose all kinds of limitations and quotas for their hospitals |
|
20. CY 2012-04-18 23:08:13 |
|
為免泄露風聲，有幾樣政策將會玩突然死亡，不讓投機者捉路，這是可以理解的。 |
|
21. A70s 2012-04-19 02:03:28 |
|
公屋富户提前賣樓作用不大,因為基本已經超出資產限額,所以一樣要交回公屋. 新界有僭建則以「坦白從寬」的方法解決,但市區私人樓宇僭建要拆,公平嗎? 香港,新界,是否一地兩制? 60年煙民在禁煙區「坦白從寬」拿起燃燒香煙一樣犯法, 汽車非法改裝,不出街5年,...停放一樣沒有危險, 但5年後「坦白從寬」出街,警察查證汽車非法改裝,是否則以「坦白從寬」的方法解決? |
|
22. Herman Larm 2012-04-19 08:48:27 |
|
認同您的見解, 期望上述事項真的能夠按照其急切性及好好運用香港市民意的支持度去做出成績來吧. |
|
23. 無可奈可 2012-04-19 09:18:52 |
|
而家香港咁迫人,點解仲要俾咁多會對香港造成壞影響的人入黎呢?
呢個社會充滿住不公平,外來人黎香港不斷搶奪資源,不單只是雙非了,
還有菲律賓人,南亞裔人等等,香港的打公仔不斷補貼緊呢班人,但自身的福利卻少之有少.
好了,不說外來人,講返本土人吧,同樣有公屋富戶或呃綜援的人濫用社會資源,試問咁樣的社會點叫人接受?
若果政府唔強硬執行一些利民政府,咁好多不公平的事永遠都解決不了.
私院每年都起政府拿取一定的資助,而且佢地根本就唔會無飯食,因為香港有很多人都需要醫療,未爆雙非之前都有好多人去私家醫院求醫,再唔係就發展其他業務例如醫學美容吧,唔係間接利用香港福利去牟取暴利,有些人話只要唔俾香港身份俾出生起香港的嬰兒便可,但到時又會有一大堆訴訟,到時又浪費公帑了, 倒不如雙管齊下,又唔俾私院收雙非,要求佢地主要服務本地產婦, 以及唔給予身份證予所有父母皆不是香港人的嬰兒身份證,我諗問題應可大致解決. |
|
24. 全力支持CY拆咗禮賓府起公屋!! 2012-04-19 10:05:13 |
|
全力支持CY拆咗禮賓府起公屋!! 一家幾口住咁大地方作死呀!! 要招待貴賓就去中聯辦度招待!! 嗰度保安警力肯定高過禮賓府!!! |
|
25. 新手 2012-04-19 10:23:47 |
|
agree with #1, 9, 11, 17 and 18 Re: 14, At least there are six out of ten Major Infratructure Projects are now in progress. |
|
26. Good good 2012-04-19 10:51:53 |
|
|
|
27. 代理 2012-04-19 10:59:42 |
|
政府應該設立獎金，鼓勵舉報僭建，將罰款10%-20%作獎金，大把人有興趣
現在地產代理生意淡薄，佢地有好多僭建資料，絕對樂意爆料，賺取生活費，又可帶動復完工程，創造就業，一舉三得。聽聞全九龍塘絕大部份都有僭建，再加埋港島豪宅區，應該可帶動數千億計的經濟增長。 |
|
28. CC 2012-04-19 17:24:04 |
|
双非若比生唔比居港權合倩不合法,是不合乎基本法,單非或双非嬰兒擁有居港權法例,人治不可凌架於法治,當曰基本法起草,CY也是招集人之一,為何今天可以大大声唔算數,否則基本法上,言論自由及集社自由,也可推翻啦,香港人不要像陳世美,因双非放釋法入關,其實比那嬰孩居港權有何問題,他在香港受教育或醫療,長大後也是香港人,成就回歸於香港,等到NBA林書豪,永遠也是NBA不會是CBA一樣,幾多港人由出世到終老也只是取政府福利啦.港人的胸襟何在! |
|
29. 無明 2012-04-20 14:30:05 |
|
基本法起草香港居民身份與落實寫出基本法時出現了差異, 是誰的責任? 就是這樣便出現莊豐源案例, 香港的高等法院及終審法院按香港的法律精神都判決雙非莊豐源有居港權, 成為案例, 這是法治精神, 亦是香港遵守法治這核心價值, 就算梁愛詩這麼愛國, 亦不能因為對香港人有影響便口輕輕以說話去否定雙非的居港權, 全世界都不會這樣做。 但CY未上任, 未認真睇清楚, 便硬說"不保證有居港權", 那麼, 終審法院的案例是否要架空? 是否等如不保證莊豐源案例有效? 是否香港7月1日以後的話事人不保證香港終審法院的案例有效? |
|
30. 勤力人 2012-04-21 03:01:11 |
|
某日睇"新聞透視"講2011年香港移民有 15%..新加坡有 11%..新加坡的 11%新移民全是大學程度...而香港只有 1%有大學程度...其餘 14% 則可能去社署囉綜緩..有良心 d 兼勤力小小就有做下野 |
|
31. JOC 2012-05-03 12:13:30 |
|
咩嘢都假,揾多D錢最實際;正研究兩個揾大錢項目有興趣Add我詳談,skype: joc0206 , QQ: 1736615307 |
|
