原來博士演講咁有形:

http://video.mingpao.com/cfm/mpfi4.cfm?File=20110826/mpfc01/pro20110729_03_512x288.txt

我認為有議員為求出位..煲大件事.. 80後年青人..浪費讀書成果(唔用腦)

我70後出生..小時讀書不成..由學徒做起..

90年代初期人工非常好..到90年代尾依然不錯..社會無咁多怨言..

日日食茶餐廳 d 員工醒晨好多..依家 d 茶餐廳新移民死下死下..好似香港人欠左佢咁

以前無須最底工資都高過依家..想想點解會係咁!!!

一來新移民太多拖底人工..

老闆們更底工資有人肯做..整個社會工資越拉越底..

社會怨言加劇..我覺得根本問題要修改移民政策..

I cannot agree any more. Those Legislative Council members and some media have been trying to stimulate and enhance the grievance of the lower classes by award and privilege obtained by property developers and policies set by the Hong Kong Government. They  focus and exaggerate the low support rate for the HK government. However, they never face their own low support rates. The HK Government should have responsiblity of providing shelters to HK citizens; however, it should not have responsibility of aiding HK citizens to own properties which are living places as well as investment means or tools.

Property owners, most of who have never financially aided by the HK Government, own their property by their effort and diligence. However, there are too many political hypocrites who magnify unlimitedly problems, gaps and grievance to obtain their votes unfortunately.

湯先生呢段好應市場狀況：

「當地產商以賤價取得土地，他日不但不會以平價推出，有良心的是會以市價賣，但按商人角度，地產商是會等待最佳的賣樓時間才將樓宇推出市場發售，土地成本不會在考慮之列，但土地價越低，利潤越高。」

無論任何業主賣樓，都唔會睇住自己入貨個價而去開價，只會睇市場成交緊幾多而放賣。

你係業主，$1000呎買入單位，而家市場成交緊$5000呎，你會唔會因為自已當年買$1000呎而唔理市場成交，好有良心咁放$1200或$1500呎？？

一般業主都明呢個道理，何況發展商？

成日嘈地產霸權既人，你地又會唔會做以上所講既良心業主？

饭民班人渣，搞的共产党政策，最终只是让一百几万小业主变穷，但是最富有的一群是不受影响到。根本就是解决不了貧富懸殊问题。

年轻人不思长进，固步自封，完全没有创富的精神。

我相信那些支持饭民的年轻人，在过几年当他们懂得反思的时候，一定会同意饭民就是垃圾，人渣。

其实现在香港政府弱势也是因为大陆政府搞出来的。饭民一直冲击政府，但是建制派不落井下石，就是坐壁上观。

好像这次李克强来香港，建制派点解缩头乌龟。

所有政客都是不思进取。饭民叫叫民主，打到地产霸权，就可以笃定当选。建制派，只要啊爷比他上，他又笃定当选。

现在香港的政治，牺牲的还是100几十万小业主。

公屋居民家庭總收入達2萬5以上者，有8萬8千户咁多，拒哋有呢個發左都有得繼續住公屋、攞政府着數、揾納稅人老襯嘅免死金牌，全因為呢班人係啲政棍嘅基本票源，所以任何政黨，包括自由黨都唔敢攪拒哋！

小學生都識計，呢班人去買2百到3百萬嘅2手居屋或者私人樓都無難度，但做到死吓死吓嘅中產，重要津貼埋呢班友攞房屋福利，呢個就係公屋起極都唔夠，啲低下階層重要住割房、棺材房嘅最大理由！！！

樓上說得不錯, 那些泛民政棍雖口若悬河, 心中卻實無一策. 個個律師,專業人士不懂貢獻社會, 只曉得煽動一班入世未深的年青人還有社會上的弱勢社群. 實乃可恥!!! 我相信歷史會證明一切, 奸侫小人的真面目最終總會昭然若揭.

不過大家也不要過份相信傳媒,不見得大部份80後都那麼無知....我身邊許多80後朋友都在默默工作著, 要成為中產. 而不想社會變得那麼暴戾

還有李克強訪港事件, 本來是件美事...卻被泛民政棍無限上綱, 顛倒是非.....試想如果是奧巴馬訪港警方作出同樣保安部署, 他們會否有如此強烈反應？

狗尚且曉得吠他人, 泛民只懂向自己人吠....狗都不如!!

李克强送來人民幣離岸中心呢份大禮，幫香港金融業打强心針就得存款簿咁大嘅報導，重要係一日貨仔，但大學生無得當面同克强示威就報足10日，電臺、電視同報紙日日疲勞轟炸，重捉埋CP、保安局長上立法會反復盤問，咁香港重想有運行？過主把啦！

現在香港的現象越來越古怪,價值觀越來越扭曲。從小父母和老師教導我們要努力讀書,發奮向上,靠自己的努力去改善生活。但是,現在的社會教下一代是向政府要福利。現在的中產,不只是供養老化的人口,更要供養青少年,新移民及以後在香港出世而父母非港人的'港童'。現在內地孕婦來港生子泛濫,用盡納稅者資源;外地勞工又要申請為港人.....一切一切都是危害香港長遠的經濟發展。我真的不明白為何大家不團結一致, 反對非港人繼續攞香港福利,削弱香港人利益而只懂搞內亂。中國很多城市都排外,如北京.上海,為何香港不能?

所有香港人都知道金融與地產是香港經濟命脈,為何大家都希望股票升而樓價跌?如果股票升太多,又沒有人說反對'股票霸權'? 恕小女才疏,到現在還未能參透.

唯一希望是香港人團結一致,先對抗外敵,保障港人利益,不俾那些只懂攞着數的非港人剝削港人利益,政府的盈餘就造福香港人,資源不被錯配。

The government officials should stay focus on the disable people, sick persons/families, singles and the elderly people who have lost their primary educations due to the lack of our resorts in the past times.

Often work hard, keep savings and investing in properties  because of excessive liquidity in the world...

Think about the priority/urgency/importance.  Stay focus !!!

 I will ask all my friends, relatives, colleages, my students, and all people I know ... DO NOT VOTE FOR ANY 泛民政棍 !!!

 *THEY WILL LEAD US TO A WELFARE SOCIETY, FINALLY LOSE HK STRONG POINTS.

 *THEY TRIED TO PREVENT HK FROM WELDING WITH CHINA RISING ECONOMY 

 *THEY SUGGEST USING VIOLENCE INSTEAD OF CONSTRUCTIVE ACTION TO EXPRESS NEEDS 

 *THEY WILL HARM HK FINALLY, EVERYONE WILL PAY FOR THE CONSEQUENCES IF THEY ARE THE MAJORITY IN LEGCO.

持重貨者看好, 沒貨者看淡....只是立場不同, 沒有什麼可爭辯的.

當沒貨者買了樓自然看好, 持貨者沽了貨自然看淡

正解！政府應確保必須品供應充足(私樓/居屋/公屋)。反正空置單位被指不多，唔夠咪推多點出來囉。

咁垃圾嘅議員就係因為有更垃圾既市民選佢地出嚟 !!

我所理解現今香港社會上所稱之"地產霸權"是指當今的幾大地產/發展商, 並非你所說的包括小業主們, 請不要將茅盾對象擴大

你憑什麽數據可支持你的說法若把香港的貧窮線標準放在任何世界一個國家上可能巳屬小康, 在你沒有實則數據時請勿胡亂說話而導至視線轉移, 你曾生活過那個國家??

其實,香港就是香港, 我們實無必要以外國乜外國物作此較, 不如你就把一個四人家庭的基本開支與收入了解一下, 如做到死都上不到樓的話那就是社會問題

李x康話同學講粗口,問候警察屋企人,唔係鬧人.

原來保安鬆開,比佢走,佢唔走,所以就係禁錮........?

所以呢,自己冇本事上樓,自然係地產霸權!

回 29.   如果以必需品為準則, 咁白米, 交通費, 學生課本都唔應該加價, 衣食住行及各類消費無一不加價, 無一不比97貴, 為何樓價接近97水平就呼天搶地? 

樓宇有一樣同其他消費不同的地方是 "可以持有後慢慢享用", 即你不可能預期通脹來臨於是囤積菠蘿包, 四寶飯, 襯巴士/港鐵未加價前搭多幾程諗住以後可慳返 d

每逢樓市回落, 總有人立下決心入市, 亦總有人猶豫不決, 現時大多為後者爭取利益, 因為樓價升過佢錯過的入市機會, 但如果樓市下跌, 那是否意味社會也應為前者作出補償?

樓宇有一部份為住用目的, 但有一部份為投資性質, 我同意政府有需要幫助未能解決居住需要的人去興建更多資助型房屋. 但投資那成份, 就讓他們自己努力儲蓄後才慎重考慮是否要買私樓好了.

我眼見以往支持開的議員, 其行為及言論越來越非再為我著想 (我不知是否如湯先生所言, 議員爭取的票倉已轉移), 但我希望繼續行使我作為公民的權利, 唯有無奈地投空白票作無聲抗議

有人說「地產霸權」做成貧富懸殊 actually is 仇富 !!

普遍人都係憎人富貴厭人窮, "仇富"只係好聽d的講法!!

Totally support 41...

Being an educated peopele, we'd say 'Thank You' when someone gives gift to us..that's the basic manner...

It seems that whenever you do anything in the name of democracy or human right, you can do whatever you want to do nowadays. It can even bypass the Laws and legal system.  Those politial sticks including those stupid and shameful barristers are damaging the prosperity of Hong Kong.

過路人你真係好攪笑，不過可能上一代真係無咁同你講啲啲老掉牙嘅嘢，致於係唔係成世做樓奴，俾地產霸權吸血呢層，咁你問吓做緊業主嘅人有無俾人吸緊血囉？我就唔察覺唔倒..............

When we talk about the Laws, some leaders/ guys said to the followers that we need quality of life !

If you point out the concerned evidences, then they speak with them about the intentions !

If you further give some examples of how hardworking people to achieve their targets, they will suspect these stories you made/listed !

For the jobs/businesses, the liars ask who steal our rice ...

社會貧富懸殊問題嚴重

As Professor Lui clearly explained in his new book, there is no major change between the above gap for the past 10 years.

When we say poverty, it means that the state of one who lacks a certain amount of possessions or money. Yet, some Hong Kong people don't have their owned property. However, we don't see any absolute poverty happened here. Comparing with those no property assets, they are relatively poor.

Poverty is related to the equal opportunity. Our youngsters face this real challenge!

The question is upward mobility. The chance for today's graduates is much lesser than yesterday in terms of more number of graduates, more barriers probably created by the ruling class (not monopoly) and less entrepreneurial opportunities. What is their choice for lifelong career? Finance, Logistic and Transportation, Service and Trading, what else?

This is the real voice. What is the equal opportunity we can provide to our next generations? If not, how can we hold the sustainability in Hong Kong.

弱勢惡勢力抬頭!

爭居權單野將會唔會為"犯民"帶黎巨大利益呢？ 今次初審無論那方勝訴，對方必然提出上訴，直至終審。"犯民"d狀棍已經大賺一筆！

假如"犯民"終審勝訴，數以十萬計"贏家"即刻會擁去入境處通宵排隊入藉，入境處如果唔批，就中晒"犯民"班狀棍"嘅伏喇，犯民"班狀棍又肯定會幫佢地去申請法援，利用司法覆核去挑戰入境處長嘅決定！

一單官司一百幾十萬閒閒地，咁多單加埋，埋單計數可能多過你d精蟲！"犯民"班狀棍呢次真係發過豬頭！

大家唔好忘記，呢班"贏家"係用緊你地納稅人d錢黎爭佢地嘅利益，贏嘅話佢地就等派彩，輸左唔該你地埋單！呢d咁筍嘅野去邊度搵呀，唯有黎香港揾"犯民"啦！

唉...如果過大海同何生咁玩法就正喇！贏左將紙袋，輸左何生比番你！哈哈哈...！