選領袖就應選賢能(因為世上沒有聖人),賢者心術正也,能者能匯聚能人也,

梁振英心術不正,口是心非,死不認錯,非賢能也!!!

CY的辩才，真係TT拍马都追唔上......

在西九事件中，辩称自己的投票起不到决定性作用，故無偏私的动机。

评委不止你一个，你一人的投票当然起不到决定性的作用啦，但与你有無偏私的动机是两回事，不能混淆。

要求重组委员会，凡可能对他抱有成见，或抱有既有立场的议员均不应加入委员会。

为何不同时要求挺他、提名他的议员同样不能加入委员会，以保证调查的公平公正？

同时要求研讯不可在选举前展开，以免对其不公。

TT单嘢点解唔叫你噶马仔选举后先爆，以免影响其选情?

查西九的人要由振英任命。因為

天下唯我獨專。

特首一定是我。

讲得好！

香港的政治人物，到现在没有一个人有勇气站出来对董先生说一句sorry。当年闹得最凶的，就是现在骂地产霸权最厉害的那一群。我真想问一问那班人：你们是不是人？

青山欲共高人語，聯翩萬馬來無數。煙雨卻低回，望來終不來。

人言頭上發，總向愁中白。拍手笑沙鷗，一身都是愁。

辦事能力、政綱、團隊等太嚴肅、死板。小道新聞、黑材料等生動有趣，容易吸引大眾的眼球。

君不見多數人喜歡八卦週刊，只有少數人才喜歡政經、學術刊物？人性如此！

大眾善忘，只關注短期利益，此亦基本人性，董建華之悲劇，亦因此造成，無奈！

然政治領袖、議員等人，則不應跟大眾心態而隨波逐流，應有遠見、大智大善，這樣才配得上領袖、議員的稱號。

更甚者，若有領袖、議員心懷不軌，故意利用、煽動大眾的短視心態，以謀取私利，則整個社會危矣！

「裸犯椒分」的樣像鬼一樣，人見人怕。現在是梁的強悍打手。

有誰能用一形容詞貼切地把她形容一下?

This time, I can't agree with Dr. Tong. 

Mr. Tung is a kind-hearted guy but he is not smart enough to lead HK to properities.  He led HK to hell in his tenure.  Though 85,000 was advocated by CY, but Mr. Tung stupidly approved that and resulted in 70% to 80% depreciation of property price.  I don't need to reiterate how bad was the economy during time....Mr. Tung definitely needed to take up the responsibility for that.

Frankly speaking, I find the existing govn't under D. Tsang are less corrupted though he now is caught with those little scandal.  But at least we don't see anything like Cyber Port, 1 Peking Road and super low land cost in Ma On Shan.  All these were involving big money and someone was a sole benefactor....and Tung's family business were closely tied with that "someone".  So, how could he be a good CE for HK.

I am a simple person.  I will judge a gov't by only by economy of HK, unemployment figure and how many local beggars lying on the street.  From what I noticed, the gov't has done a good job though we may find it weak....but that's because HK is too free and lenient to those abusing the freedom of speech and press....I can guarantee you, HK gov't will never be a strong gov't under these kind of setup.

That's right, just focus on little women & disclosures ! Nobody talks about the past experiences, the policies, & the team members for implementation of the given policies !

Like global investors for securities trading, many hongkongers would like to have trading ranges for selling and buying. They already forgot Mr Tung  & Mr Donald Tsang who had a very high marks on public opinion polls during the election for CEO of HK.

Over 50% of population don't worry about HK will go bankrupt because they strongly believe the government can give some supports and allowances in due course. Also, they don't discuss who can handle another financial tsunami & economic crisis due to the financial bombs activiated from the bonds/ huge debts in the major advanced countries such as USA, Europe, UK and Japan.

One thing they care is what benefits will be given !

That's politics !

一班政棍日日抽政府後腳為己任,不務正業已成為香港大眾核心價值,傳媒只跟隨做大眾新聞,非客觀報導, 果個＂流夢遺＂嘅說話有什麼新聞價值呢！一個典型抽水政棍搏出位行徑！！馬尿博士專設計下午茶時段做民調,全部為口味而發表,一般平民百姓日日被洗腦式灌輸傾斜形民主,選特首.....只是一個焦點吧了!!!當位嘅亦要隨波逐流賴以生存!!!如此下去,香港還可以有什麼前途可言!!......唉!!

我等一般蟻民，只得任由一眾政棍黨羽愚弄禍港，盡取所欲！！香港人，醒醒吧！！

GST is one of options when everyone is talking about the individual contributions to the society. However, we need to face the reality that the lawmakers already rejected the proposal several years ago.

Apart from the subsidies to the public estates, we must note that the middle-class people and private homeowners who have given a lot for building a world-class infrastuctures such as Public Hospitals,International Airport, & MTR,  and providing world-class services including affordable drugs, 15-year free education, leading universities, HK$2 for public transportation for senior citizens.

Without the taxes from these taxpayers & land sales,  7 million population should ask where the sustainable funds came from ? why we can have a very low tax rates & a very simple tax system in the world ?

Again, they are not interesting to discuss about that, eveyone loves to take advantage !

That's politics !

Communists have to go through revolutions from time to time for progress in the political system. Recent events in HKSAR are consequences of a marxist revolution. I think this is good to clear up the past wrongs and mistakes so that HKSAR can proceed in the correct direction both politically and economically.

回９樓：有誰能用一形容詞貼切地把她形容一下?

：攞飯招婚

From the point of management, the appointment /election of Mr Tung as CEO would not have a good chance of success in leadership. As everyone knows that Mr Tung and his team members including CY & Mrs Chen/Chan, the former head of civil servants worked as partnership.

We can imagine what's wrong with civil servants who had at least 2 heads running the central government. In case of conflict of interests or disagreements, they had to face a question of Who's who ?

That's what we keep on saying a strong team members for implememating the policies is required. We do NOT need a single-man  or spokeman for offices, & a fighter in a peaceful time.

To No. 21. 唐既狼且辣又阴狠

If your argument is right, that means our government officials don't want him to lead them.  In this case, how can CY run the gov't effectively and efficiently??

One of the critical points is the disclosure from CY. Please don't think too much on the west kowloon project.

Hope to see some findings in the coming days.

香港有点事基层霸权。香港最大的政治势力，第一手公屋户，第二是公务员，第三才是你说的地产霸权。

中产才是弱势社群。

如果中央真的如生果日報說的"中央(習近平)已決定了梁振英做特苜", 我會對他好失望.

唐唐有不好的地方,但以選特首來說,梁振英比唐唐差好多!

習近平, 請你三思!

本人一介草民, 只在廠裹當一個小小的工程師

Very Good Ideas ! As everyone knows that we are not going to pick up a perfect executive officer. Whether you like it or not, we are living in a real world.

We repeatedly expressed to look for a qualified, and experienced one who can contribute the best benefits to the society. If not, how's about the school teacher, youth counsellor, great thinker, smarter pastor, or the Pope as our future CEO ?

七百萬港人都知道，「空口講白話」者，乃「唐生大地震」主角唐英年是也：唐入政府九年，擔任人口政策督導委員會主席，既不「督」也不「導」，做了四年主席，對「雙非」孕婦來港產子毫不作為，期間「雙非」產嬰高逾十三萬名！又如唐擔任主席的扶貧委員會，被巿民譏為「愈扶愈貧」，到頭來也關門大吉；再如唐主持大嶼山發展專責小組，多年來一事無成，以至去秋當地居民向唐「討債」，指其無兌現承諾。

再者唐口講「誠信」，但「僭建門」卻被公認「謊唐」，乃十足「空口講白話」！

To 東方,

What you said about TT might be right (I don't the detail things), but to me, he might not achieve great things, but he never did severe harm to HK as well.  But CY's 85,000 was deadly to HK economy and HK people did suffer greatly.  And he never knew or admitted the truth.

Under TT, he did relief the wine tax and now HK is the largest wine trading port in the world.  But actually, favouring TT is not because he has great achievement or smart, is only because CY is really a very bad choice.  And leave us only TT as a choice.

POST FROM OBSERVER:

2003年淘大花園成為「沙士」重災區，葉興國説：「3月26日沙士爆發，3月31日E座封樓，4月1日隔離居民，4月10日居民才出隔離營返回淘大花園。見過鬼都怕黑，的士司機也避開不敢到淘大花園。」他沒想到4月末的時侯，在很多人仍對淘大花園避之則吉，甚至很多高官都不敢到訪的時候，CY竟主動聯絡他，並帶著一班專業人士前來，直入災情嚴重的E座範圍，為居民解決浴室地台去水渠傳播病毒的問題。葉興國追憶當時的情況説：「CY是親身到現場視察，跟我們詳細討論需要後，他便立刻籌了七十多萬，幫助全楝E座更換全新設計的隔水器。」他説：「還記得在往後的第二次開會，他們已做了一個隔水器新設計的樣板，我雖然是『行外人』，但很直率地批評新設計，沒想到CY和在場的專家聽後，立刻改善設計方案。」這種「容得下」的胸襟到今天仍然令葉興國不時將居民的需要向CY傳達。他説：「無它，大家都是以『心』來為居民服務。」