以上私樓 28 K 入息中位數係唐榮自己提供嘅，可能包埋住緊每間一百呎唔夠嘅「私人住宅租客」都唔定！

請唐榮先生將上述幾項例子「加權」，再作比較又點睇？

終於等到湯博新文---就是有幽默感、有引用歷史、有諷刺時弊......

湯博的文章，就是不平凡！

還望多多創作，造福讀者。

To No. 6) Home Owner,

Maybe I'll try to explain a little bit......Yes, supposingly people that have to rely on social fringe benefits are not those private owned houses buyers.  But BUDDY, there's a PROLONGED PROCESS for people that turned themselves into benefit-seekers:namely bad luck, prolonged sickness, LAZY BONES, NO OBJECTIVES IN LIFE, mostly fall into this catergory>INCAPABLE OF MANAGING ONE'S OWN FINANCE & SAVINGS.

What we're discussing here is not cutting people's benefits to boost the property prices, is NOT TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE THAT CAN HELP THEMSELVES RELY ON SOCIAL BENEFITS!!!  Most people fall into marginal catergories:live in public housing, if they determine to work hard & save hard(of coz' the process is painful & it's always easier said than done!!!), they have the potential & ability to change the rest of their lives & the reward is the valuation of property prices.  I myself & some public housing buddies are living examples that it works & we know more people that are still staying in public housing b'coz they never ever want a change & do nothing at all!!!  They were there 35yrs!!!!

For the price to earning ratio, we would like to compare it on the similar conditions as follows: -

1. Earnings after HK Salaries Tax / VAT vs earnings after Incomes Tax & VAT in the other cities;

2. Earnings after 12-year education fees in HK vs earnings after elementary and higher school fees in the listed cities; and

3. Earnings after 1-year medical expenses in HKHA vs earnings after one year medical expenses in the given cities.

Hope to see the price to net income ratio...

We have heard that our private home prices have included land prices which transfer to obtain other lands & build the public housing, world-class infrastructures, hospitals, etc.

Did the so-called price-to-family incomes consider that  ???

『家庭年收入的12.6倍』呢個係D學究得出黎嘅數字，在其他國家計算『家庭年收入』非常準確，但在香港一定低估！在香港開舖的人可能年年報無錢賺，但卻見他家肥屋閏，自僱人士有幾多個會報足收入呢？

The way to do the calculation may have differnt views and carry argument from different sectors. The main issue is that even if HK is not the top, but the top FIVE and is not 12.6 but 9.6 still it is far beyond the capability for most HKers to buy an unit condo. poor HKers.

對於還未能取得150票入閘的梁振聰，唐唐實在無需與之辯論。要辯論請先證明自己有本事取得入閘之票再說。反正遲早有辯論，又何必那麼急? 市民要聽的是特首的政綱，要孔振聰(孔七十三)的豬狗論何用???

對於害死多少人的八萬五只字不言，斗膽指手劃腳批評扶貧工作，真的狗急跳墻乎???

對於無所不用其極的焦急掙扎，唐唐真的不用理。

"鄭要糖"提及"田北俊"說，可能會在特首選舉中投白票是不負責任？

請問"鄭要糖"，你當年以工聯會身份出任公職，就立即為富商說好話，打壓工人，是否是很負責任呢？