ENG
瀏覽人次:5831    回應:2
 
我要回應
我的稱呼
回應 / 意見
驗証文字
 
會員登入
登入ID 或 網名
密碼
1. Hongkong People 2012-04-21 12:35:53
What's your implication of those figures??  Are you implying that HK can allow 40%-50% drop in property price without any huge impact in HK economy??

If yes, I find you a bit too simple and sometimes naive. If the property price drops that much, the negative wealth effect will spin off a serious fall in different industries i.e. retail, F&B and a lot other property related business i.e. legal, property agent, mortgage business, interior design and renovation business and etc...

Stable property prices, or if correction will happen, the best is a soft landing with not more than 30%, don't ever advocate a deep drop in property price.  That will just do more harm to HK.

And, according to your logic, if no negative asset will be fine to HK.  I have a more radical way....just let the govn't domesticates all flats with no mortgage (60% of homeowners according to 2011 census).  There will be no negative asset created by this action.


2. 無明 2012-04-21 23:31:19

Agree 1樓。

 

一個普通人的想法是, 任何市場跌40%都實死, 就算唔死都一身潵, 有排搞。

 

按揭比律低與樓市可否承受大幅下跌, 根本不能掛鉤。

 

簡單舉例: 如果按揭只餘10%, 樓市是否可以承擔90%下跌?