1. Financial Analyst 2015-02-24 08:59:03 |
|
Mr Gulliver started working at HSBC Hong Kong Treasury department in 1994 and he became the Head of Treasury HK in1996-2000. After that, he was the CEO of HSBC Investemnet bank Asia Pacific in 2001. He moved to London around 2004-2006 and he became the Global Head of Global Banking & Markets of HSBC. In 2011, he became the CEO of HSBC holdings. He has worked at HSBC for more than 20 years. |
2. yy 2015-02-24 09:41:28 |
|
這裡的文章多是信口開河,陳述數據未經考證,有時連普通常識這一關也過不了。 |
3. 在職貧窮 2015-02-24 09:57:24 |
|
對湯生的常識感到失望
(唔知今次又係咪專登誇大呢?) |
4. TO 2樓 2015-02-24 09:58:33 |
|
數據係死,人係生,捉到鹿要懂脱角,; 昨日摆在眼前的汇丰業績;人人都知的數据, 但如何解讀,預測和部署就可分高下; 博士的影響力不在數據最多, 我最想學的係一位有實戰和有戰績的将領如何拆解時局,。 |
5. 湯文亮 2015-02-24 10:40:08 |
|
yy, 在你批評別人的時候,首先要了解對方,你說我順口開河,我請你再讀我在2011年11月15日在湯文亮專欄所寫的文章「匯豐業績下跌是意料」,對歐智華的工作亦早有定論,請明鑑 |
6. 打工仔 Andy 2015-02-24 10:49:47 |
|
同意博士的睇法, 一個未能帶領公司走出困局的領導應該離開, 樣其他來做, 看看索尼就知! |
7. to 2/F yy 2015-02-24 11:10:20 |
|
哪方面的常識過不了關?可否引例說明?否則也只是順口開河。 |
8. abc 2015-02-24 11:38:07 |
|
|
9. 途人甲 2015-02-24 11:44:26 |
|
湯博士如作為匯豐銀行的股東(?)當然有權為其投資批評公司的領導方針及策略。就算作為非股東亦有言論自由作評論。 然而,湯生身具博士身份,大家會對其立論(無論結論最終正確與否)的依據有著對學者一樣高的要求。文章中幾點顯然不準確(如歐智華進入匯豐時間、其6千萬港元等值花紅是2003年前所收、涉及報導的瑞士銀行戶口經已於2009年結戶,比其2011年就任匯豐CEO還早兩年等等),對此湯博士沒有了解清楚而作出如此猜想及立論,固然有點不理想。 希望將來能繼續讀到湯博士的高質素文章。 |
10. 錯字提醒 2015-02-24 12:37:00 |
|
話哂那些都是劊子手酬勞 |
11. 惜緣 2015-02-24 13:08:13 |
|
最近這些“有心人”是醉翁之意不在酒。 |
12. Jonathan 2015-02-24 13:36:06 |
|
汤先生,请继续,"我手写我口"...讲心底话. 须然这次资料有点出入.. 恕我肤浅! 在香港, 很少有有钱人愿意每天这样无私分享的! 人o地都上岸了,教你把托!
做第十个人是不容易的...
一变淡,个个反转猪肚!
|
13. Admin 2015-02-24 14:17:54 |
|
|
14. 湯生Fans 2015-02-24 22:29:51 |
|
I also want him to resign. This company earn money from Hong Kong and hire a lot of rubbish but senior staff from the Europe who just do nothing but keep talking. UK has a lot of redundancy but the management can do little because of labor union. Hong Kong has no labor union so every time they do redundancy it starts with Hong kong. I am totally disappointed. |
15. Oscar Lam 2015-02-24 22:51:15 |
|
這幾年匯豐公佈業績,每一次都有驚嚇,太令人失望!還好在80元左右全部清倉,一手不留。 |
|