博士，

你是不是说 “ 所以，贊成政府出招的是少數人，但政府又從善如流，變成多數服從少數，似乎這不是民主的表現。 ”

实在坦心如果搂价又升会刺激政府再出手干预。

失業率至6.5%或僅需年半

美國失業率何時才會回落至聯儲局的目標水平，各界預測不一，就連聯儲局內部對2013年失業率預測範圍由6.9%至7.8%，高低位亦相差近1個百分點，不同的經濟預測之下的加息時間表，隨時相差逾一年。

究竟失業率何時才會回落至6.5%？粗略地計一計，美國失業率由2009年10月10%的高峰回落至上月的7.8%，歷時39個月，期間非農業就業職位增加428.7萬個。換言之，要令失業率下跌1個百分點，約需194萬個新增職位。若按近兩年平均每月新增15.3萬個職位，失業率大約需時16.5個月便會回落至6.5%，亦即2014年5月，計入兩個月誤差，時間大約為2014年首季至年中左右。聯儲局預測美國今年經濟略高於去年，意味職位增長的速度有機會更高，失業率或可能更快便能回落至6.5%水平。

而另外的一半則大多數住公屋

包括那些已有幾部士牌，又有幾層收租私樓物業，子女已長大成人做醫生律師成家立室，欺騙政府霸著［風水］公屋，又不用被罰坐監的那班香港狗公屋富戶嗎?

打擊公屋富戶，全港未上樓的市民有責，必須舉報！！！

！！！　公　　屋　政　　策　　不　　是　　請　　客　　吃　　飯　！！！　　　

公屋富戶為何有名貴私家車代步，有的士牌收租，有幾層私樓收租，子女長大成人做了律師醫生的，不會給家用嗎？為何這班富貴老人恃老，霸著公屋，讓低下階層卜不到車？

而另外的一半則大多數住公屋

包括那些已有幾部的士牌，又有幾層收租私樓物業，子女已長大成人做醫生律師成家立室，欺騙政府霸著［風水］公屋，又不用被罰坐監的那班公屋霸權－食屎公屋富戶嗎?

＃＃打擊公屋富戶，全港未上樓的市民有責必須舉報＃＃

！！！　公　　屋　政　　策　　不　　是　　請　　客　　吃　　飯　！！！　　

公屋富戶為何有名貴私家車代步，有的士牌收租，有幾層私樓收租，子女長大成人做了律師醫生的，不會給家用嗎？為何這班富貴老人恃老，霸著公屋，讓低下階層卜不到車？

回應標題==> 輿論是否真的會變成真理?

Yes, pretty much my opinions too.....

Just have some thoughts tonight after having dinner with my husband, we went to a cozy Indian Restaurant in Sheung Wan on 1/F of some old commercial bldg that they still can offer you a set dinner for two for $208 including 7 dishes & two drinks(beer included).  We both almost have our eyes opened-wide & couldn't believe it!(the food was excellent no kidding!!!)  I told my husband the Rest. was there for at least 15-20 years & we then jump to the conclusion, the owner must have bought the place & his running cost is so cheap that he could offer the food so cheap......

Actually there're also different dim-sum places in Sheung Wan that are not charging customers market price(market price for me means you'll have to pay at least $100 per head for lunch to get some reasonable things to fill up your stomach)  Try your luck to find them!  Again we as Sheung Wan working people concluded the owner must have owned the place!

So what's my point here??  My point here is to encourage the people to manage their finances properly & with great responsibility!  So not just you yourself can benefit from it but the Zone 1 people that you interact with(what Zone 1 people? Your direct family, your customers/clients, your subordinates, people that rely on your pay-check/indirectly affected by how much you make)

I believe not everyone can afford to own their own property but they should at least try to own one, and if possible own extra one/two properties& make yourself more settled financially.  Then you don't have to go crazy & increase so much of your rent if you have a good tenant.  We have all our apartments the "below market rent" ranging from $2,000 to $7,000 per month. Yes, we're abit crazy people but we're having good cash flow & there's no need to drive our tenants crazy too!!!  For those who just wanna complain here, if you can give it a bet to change your destiny, try your very best!  Otherwise, pray that you have a landlord like me........

Yes, pretty much my opinions too.....

Just have some thoughts tonight after having dinner with my husband, we went to a cozy Indian Restaurant in Sheung Wan on 1/F of some old commercial bldg that they still can offer you a set dinner for two for $208 including 7 dishes & two drinks(beer included).  We both almost have our eyes opened-wide & couldn't believe it!(the food was excellent no kidding!!!)  I told my husband the Rest. was there for at least 15-20 years & we then jump to the conclusion, the owner must have bought the place & his running cost is so cheap that he could offer the food so cheap......

Actually there're also different dim-sum places in Sheung Wan that are not charging customers market price(market price for me means you'll have to pay at least $100 per head for lunch to get some reasonable things to fill up your stomach)  Try your luck to find them!  Again we as Sheung Wan working people concluded the owner must have owned the place!

So what's my point here??  My point here is to encourage the people to manage their finances properly & with great responsibility!  So not just you yourself can benefit from it but the Zone 1 people that you interact with(what Zone 1 people? Your direct family, your customers/clients, your subordinates, people that rely on your pay-check/indirectly affected by how much you make)

I believe not everyone can afford to own their own property but they should at least try to own one, and if possible own extra one/two properties& make yourself more settled financially.  Then you don't have to go crazy & increase so much of your rent if you have a good tenant.  We have all our apartments the "below market rent" ranging from $2,000 to $7,000 per month. Yes, we're abit crazy people but we're having good cash flow & there's no need to drive our tenants crazy too!!!  For those who just wanna complain here, if you can give it a bet to change your destiny, try your very best!  Otherwise, pray that you have a landlord like me........

Singapore just imposed a new measure to tax local Singapore residents when buying the 2nd property.  .....非首次住房買家，房貸首付款，由樓價一成，上調到二成半。購買第二套房的新加坡公民，買方印花稅7%，第二套10%。購買第一套住房的新加坡永久居屋，買方印花稅5%，第二套10%。.......

For details, pls refer to http://hk.centanet.com/icms/template.aspx?series=233&article=45372

In my opinion, HK will follow Signapore to impose the extra tax when buying the 2nd property. 

However, these kinds of measures cannot effectively cool down the residential property market.  This is because 在同一私人屋苑内 , 居於自罝物业的家庭數目佔该屋苑家庭總數 平均约 75 - 76%, according to 2011年人口普查.  That means the speculation in residential mkt  is NOT serious as many people imagine.  The current demands for house is 真正剛性住屋需求. 

Hence , if HK govt imposes new intervention measures, I think it cannot lower property prices eventually, unless hk can increase supply significantly

I will publish the data later on, after completing my analysis

PP---根據特區政府天才思考方式推想，下一波出招，應該係揾那些有第二套房的投資者來開刀，但呢劑藥又有無效呢？小弟不才，同你討論一下。

經過呢幾年政府多樣化打房政策折騰，嗰啲胆汁少啲嘅小業主，都應該俾 CY 三振出局，沽曬所有非自住嘅物業不特止，隨時連自住樓都賣埋等樓災者亦唔少！

咁留下來嘅死淨種，如果唔係持貨實力好强嘅收租佬，就係有實際自住需要嘅一群！

因此如非係創紀錄新高；真係要樓換樓嘅家長客；或真係有強烈財務需要嘅人。業主肯定雷打不放！二手盤嘅來源將越來越少，恐怕連小學生都知悉！

實施埋打擊第二套房投資有乜東東嘢會發生？咁就使到那些擁有非自住物業嘅投資者，更加下定決心，「誓死不沽」！！因為賣咗層樓之後，根本無可能再買得翻，咁邊個人會做出這超高難度動作？這樣  2 手盤嘅來源會更加少，隨時一兩個對價格唔在意嘅買家，就可以將成個屋邨嘅呎價炒到飛起！