haha:你知唔知你講緊什麼?新界樓價咁低殘,差唔多平過深圳,你仲話要打壓係好無道理,不理新界樓業主嘅艱苦景況,你有何居心?

舉例如:粉領中心,嘉湖山莊,浪翠園或愉景新城等等嘅優質私人屋苑,宜家樓價只係每呎@2,300至@4,200左右,樓價在140萬就有交易,是97價嘅6-7成.

首期16萬,月供4,200元左右,就可上車買呢啲優質樓,幾乎任何一位年輕人,只要有一份正當職業,便可以買到樓,haha你話還要打壓新界樓價,你係唔係香港人啊?

胡錦濤只接見李嘉誠,表示國家撐香港商界,李嘉誠於商界最有代表性,地位超然.可能亦想李嘉誠和香港商界做多些好事,支持政府施政.

另一方面可能亦表示胡錦濤支持香港地產,香港樓價要大幅下調並不容易.

我心涼是否要早些去買新界樓?

蔡志忠 just tell jokes here ! No need to trust him ! 

Sell the house to lose $3M and why do so for a business man ? urgent for cash ? why they did not keep it to rent instead ? 

Again, choosing a flat in what location is very important ! No need to compare in the HK island side or NT side ! It is useless !

買樓要買香港島, 迫於無奈買九龍, 走投無路買新界

愉景新城低層單位,現時仍有每呎@4,200,唔信,你去睇一睇!

另請你話俾大家知,97年是什麼價?

不如叫政府支持電刑和仙股丫，點解要支持樓市唔支持股市？都係投資之嘛！

原因好簡單，因為地產係政府打庄，係最大利益集團，高官利益所在，尤其是離職後的利益，官商勾結，你話冇？阿水信！推高地價，等於抽市民重稅，就係咁簡單。

睇真啲,如買新界樓,真係只要有一份正當職業便可,各位如要上車,可選新界樓,其樓價仍然落后大市!

冇買過樓嘅年青人,唔好成日咁粗魯,唔好忘記香港係禮儀之都,作為"挑 & ON 9者",想挑起罵戰都要睇對象,咁樣針對我哋新界樓業主未免太過份了.

年輕人未買過樓,唔知道負資產及破產嘅苦況,心地咁差遲早會有報應,就祝你地成世買唔到私家樓啦!

咁你又唔好詛咒人, 我剛剛買左市區樓, 我係用家, 昇跌都冇辦法, 只能量力而為. 唔通下年樓市跌, 我又可以話自己好可憐, 博同情咩~~~

買得就預左有昇有跌, 跌左就話自己可憐, 咁昇左你係咪會攞錢出嚟大家分呀?

因为大陆投资移民不买沙田, 大埔和马鞍山, 所以楼价比较和理.

这也证明政府一定要提高投资移民的UPPER LIMIT 到一千两百万.

政府是否應該大力發展新界區,吸引多些人到新界置業,不要總是要買市區樓,市區樓應下調,新界樓要上升至平均和合理!

除咗供應多以外, 地契年期亦好重要, 香港島大部份九九九年期, 等同永久賣斷俾你, 唔駛俾地租. 所以港島樓咁值錢. 九龍地要續地契, 新界地更得五十年. 政府有權唔同你續, 每季要納地租, 小數怕長計. 所以港島樓貴過九龍樓, 九龍樓貴過新界樓

樓市從來是強者越,這跟新供應很大關係,手持豪宅及港島樓大部份是實力投資,不輕易平讓,樓價也難大跌原因.

It is NOT right to take any measures to stimulate the property price of N.T. to rise but to lower that of kln or hk islnad lower. Overall HK property price should be lowered to prevent bubble and assist our 25+ age to create their families with lovely homes. Two room flat of tai koo shing, olympics is at value of around HK$5M which is too high.  I felt a bit upset with those some speculators to buy public estates. The record high public flat was HK$2.07M. The buyer should be from relatively lower class family. Our government should STOP this phenomenon.  

新界樓都係屬於香港物業,不應受到勿視,近年來有很多香港人,由市區搬去新界居住,並買樓置業,新界區住的大都是本港人,反而市區就吸引了很多外來客,而這些進駐的外地人士,都是比較優秀的,亦附合了香港吸引外資的政策,有利香港經濟繁榮.

問題是當港人高價賣掉市區樓給外地人後,搬去新界買樓住,這些樓應該也要有保值作用,大多數97年買樓的人現在還在望樓興嘆,是不應該的.

世界在改變,中國在大進步,貨幣在大縮水,樓價一定要上升,才可追上通脹,政府更要大力發展新界區,拉近市區和新界樓價距離,保護多數港人身家財產!

作者想籍此表達新界業主的無奈,同時亦道出香港樓價的不均衡發展,希望港府制定房屋政策時要照顧各方利益.

作者想政府出招打壓樓市時,應針對高價樓方面,至於低價樓,特別是新界樓,其實還是很便宜,不要再干預了.但是當局是否會知道呢?不要太理想主義了!

政府十月再出招抑制樓市已是事在必行,無論新界業主鍾唔鍾意都好,就算整體中下價樓仍然唔貴都好,反對高樓價的聲音已按奈不下,政府迫於無奈一定要再落重葯了.

問題是樓價下跌和樓市淡靜對香港不一定有好處,銀紙大縮水,通脹快來臨,樓價大幅下調並不能反映實際經濟狀況,反而會因此而令港人資產及財富減少,影響個人資產的銀行評級,想出售樓宇變現更加困難,影響年老的退休生活.

When the property price really drops down sharply like 50%, those against high property price people or politican would instead blame HK gov react too slow, causing too much bubble in past two years. Thus hurting all interest of HK people because gov control property price too slowly.

Those youngsters claiming price  too high, would still not shut their mouth, and blame HK gov not doing well in the economy causing high unempolyment rates( which is expected when HK property price drop significantly). Even the price low,they still not willing to buy those cheap property.

I think marjority of ppl do not want property price to drop by 50%. 20% is reasonable enough. Government's act to increase land supply would in turn increase construction job supply and so improve the economy. Dont lie to our readers. Transportation improves a lot in N.T and so the property price nearby it increases better. I perceive that we have some greedy and selfish property speculators in here who just want to safeguard their assets and earn more money from it. I agree our govt should have better land use in N.T. and so stimulate more economic activities, i.e. building up government offices complex. Put more constraint to combat property speculation as well as professional immigration scheme. 

is it easy to control the range you want ? It's too naive to set a range as there are too many factors, HK is international city where many of economic activities are not only affected by local, but by global.  

Just like 97, the original purpose of 85000 to lower the HK property price by so called 10-20% , turn out to be HK property price dropping by 70%.  Who can estimate ?? What gov do is limited, and is already right by selling more land. Getting more bonus, when the eco downturn, it has enough reserve to stimulate and regulate HK economy . Not understand why somebody request gov to take strong action of executive nature (like communist).    

Also, there are still so many relatively cheaper apartments in Kowloon  (old ones- Old district in Kwun Tong) or some even district in HK island (Chai Wan), many in NT such as T-Mun, Yuen Long, are still under 2M !!   Did those people try to find out ?  

香港樣樣都好,言論自由,文明民主,政府施政公開透明度高,是國際都市,人人推崇.

就是樓價高低唔公平,我們新界樓業主真係苦命,多數人還在望家鄉!

I dont intend to set the target, it is just a reference of myself that 20% drop is a reasonably enough. I dont think the price in yr 03 or 04 is healthy. It is necessary to have meaures to drop the property price. Altough there are HK$2M flat is NT west area, we should think of family support. Family is a single unit of a society. Living nearby our own parents would surely build cohesivness and reinforce relationship. This is a concern that our government should not miss out. Government should make use of large reserve to implement measures to promote societal harmony.  Though debt to income ratio (供樓佔入息比率) is around 40%, home is not everything. We have to pay more to raise our children i.e. schooling fee, play group, interest group as well as home maid, financially support our parents (who most of them dont have MPF etc). 25+ yr old dont have enough first instalment to buy, 35+ yr old have many diffrent kinds of expenditure. Mortgage is NOT our family expenditure. I have some fds who wants to purchase a large flat to improve the quality of living but suspend it now due to high rising price.  Pls open up your eyes.    

宜家樓市開始淡靜,政府十月再出招打壓樓價,睇你香港市區樓價仲唔跌.

老實講,多數年輕人要上車買樓,都唔揀新界樓,雖然買新界樓很容易上到車.原因唔係唔方便,其實都有好多人在九龍新界返工,只係因樓價升值太慢而已.

遲啲加埋息,資金走咗,市區樓要跌三成唔難,太家等待一下就OK啦!

 With the open up of West Railway, Siu Hong to Kowloon center take only 25 mins ? there are so many HK going nowadays to China to work, and takes 1-2 hours to go back and forth everyday. Why some of our young guys cannot afford to travel longer time, and like in a green house, always ask for protection and not willing to adapt to changing envirnoment 

Have you found out in some remote region like Sau Mau Ping (kwun Tong) in urban district and Sum Shui Po, Tai Kwok Tsui still have under 2M, still have 600 fts less than 1.5 M ?? (around 30-35 years age). Some small flats in Shatin still have many under 2M like golden lion garden in Tai Wai, Garden Rivera in Shatin close to urban area

港人總是把焦點放在市區新樓和豪宅上,這跟報章傳煤愛報導高價成交有關,這些報導都愛蛙眾取寵,以誇大手法吸引觀眾目光,因此大眾均認為香港樓價是天價.

其實有一半港人住在新界區,新界環境優美空氣清新,交通也四通八達,更重要的是樓價仍是很便宜,200萬以內還有很多選擇,樓價的確和深圳差不多.

港人最愛買市區樓的主要原因,是因為可以等到升值後賣給大陸同胞,大家便可以大賺一筆,從商業投資角度看,就知道港人為什麼不想買新界樓了,但是假如有一天,大陸客發現新界樓原來這麼便宜,而都跑都去買時,大家就要比他們快一步入市了.

Not all NT flats are cheap, MOS sunshine city ~HK$5000/ sq feet, Festival City ~$9000/sq feet. Not to mention 獨立屋 in Sheung Shui.

【東方日報】不少買家憂慮樓價繼續升溫，不惜以高價「上車」，令細價樓被炒至「水漲船高」，其中沙田第一城一個面積395方呎單位，日前獲用家追價至每呎逾5,800元售出，僅約一個月內再創同類單位九七年後新高；同區偉華中心一個中層面積400餘方呎單位，亦獲租客追價至236萬元售出，創同類單位九七年後新高。

利嘉閣何家健稱，上述沙田第一城1座高層D室，面積約395方呎，原開價約225萬元，終獲買家追價5萬元至230萬元售出，呎價5,823元，創同類單位九七年後新高，單位約三個月即升值約20%。據悉，同座對上一層單位，上月曾以約226萬元售出，已創同類型單位新高紀錄，此類單位短短一個月內再創新高，樓價再升近1.8%。

新界已返家鄉!! No more complaint pls.

【東方日報】不少買家憂慮樓價繼續升溫，不惜以高價「上車」，令細價樓被炒至「水漲船高」，其中沙田第一城一個面積395方呎單位，日前獲用家追價至每呎逾5,800元售出，僅約一個月內再創同類單位九七年後新高；同區偉華中心一個中層面積400餘方呎單位，亦獲租客追價至236萬元售出，創同類單位九七年後新高。

利嘉閣何家健稱，上述沙田第一城1座高層D室，面積約395方呎，原開價約225萬元，終獲買家追價5萬元至230萬元售出，呎價5,823元，創同類單位九七年後新高，單位約三個月即升值約20%。據悉，同座對上一層單位，上月曾以約226萬元售出，已創同類型單位新高紀錄，此類單位短短一個月內再創新高，樓價再升近1.8%。

新界業主已返家鄉!! No more complaint pls.

跌了9成9的電刑蟹民，又使唔使政府掃番高個價俾佢返家鄉？

作為新界人,我地係很不滿及眼紅市區樓業主,香港就係呢一樣唔公平,點解新界樓價咁低殘,市區樓價咁高企?

講到底,都係果啲大陸佬,唔來新界買樓,至搞到新界樓冇得升,仲有果啲自私嘅地產經紀,一味介紹市區樓及新樓,貪其佣金高,咁樣梗係市區豪宅及新樓逾來逾高,新界樓價越更加低迷.

提議政府,與其要限制內地客買樓,不如禁止佢地買市區樓,只給佢地買新界樓,新界樓價升番,香港社會就更加公平和諧一啲!

看到樓價這麼高,報紙日日係講:X X 賣樓賺幾多,X X 花園X X 樓持貨幾年,大賺......快來買啊,手快有,手慢無!!!

我看像07年股市,日日新高,個個賺錢. 專家教路......快樂景象....

現在恐怕很多人手中的貨都沒望見家鄉吧?

除咗供應多以外, 地契年期亦好重要, 香港島大部份九九九年期, 等同永久賣斷俾你, 唔駛俾地租. 所以港島樓咁值錢. 九龍地要續地契, 新界地更得五十年. 政府有權唔同你續, 每季要納地租, 小數怕長計. 所以港島樓貴過九龍樓, 九龍樓貴過新界樓.

根據某大行研究報告, 3個月HIBOR 將會在Mar 2012開始從0.3%開始緩慢上升, 到2015年初才升到3% (即實質按揭約3.7%), 即我們所謂的正常利率. 超低息期從2012年開始成為歷史, 但請切記之後的只是由超低過渡至低息期, 而只是人們所預計的一加息樓市就會冧~~

大家不要以為利率還會升到一個不能接受的水平, 因為自從利率協議解除後, 銀行爭按揭越來越白熱化, 但這是一個不可逆轉的情況~而且借貸利率升, 存款息也跟著升.....而加息的前提是通脹, 通脹必令租金上升....所以大家明白97年後大部份時間"供平過租"的原因了,而這情況將持續一段很長的時間.

我認為將現在的樓價, 或者泡沫程度直接和97年相比是不合理而且將問題簡單化. 不說別的, 只要想想97年你持有100港元好用還是而家100港元好用~ 樓價用貨幣表示, 但貨幣的購買力不停下降.....這是炒出來的結果嗎？市場熱錢是聰明的，你寧可持有物業還是現金呢？

結論是, 樓市上升是低息加狂印銀紙的後遺症~

看這個博客了解到新界業主這麼可憐 ，

讓我們大陸佬幫忙，組團到香港買新界樓，

告訴我買那一個區。

不用求香港政府。

Why 政府要特別搞活新界區樓市?

政府起鐵路只是方便居民, 創造就業! 元朗屯門樓價近幾年已升了好多, 元朗近鐵路屋苑升至$4000 to $5000多, 屯門市中心一帶也$3500. 真的唔平 (雖然銀碼仲可以$2M to $2.5M上車)。

Not because property rise up siginificantly.

Have you checked all commerical product rise up, like Gold, Oil, sugar, flour,  ....

Even food, transportation fee (tram, MTR, Taxi) later public utility -> all rise up. Should our gov control them ?? Why no complaint on this?? because not only property rise up, it's the money falling down -> HK dollars falling down ! because Yen, RMB going up. US dollar falling down, HK$ is in same boat with US$.

Inflation will be coming like a typoon.    

老實講,九龍站上蓋物業,如果唔係呢班自私嘅地產經紀為咗特高嘅佣金,狂推大陸人去買,那裡值咁嘅價錢,以前地產啇所投地價每呎只是4千幾而已,因此產生暴利.

時至今日,再提起九龍站物業,香港嘅有錢人仍然很不屑,認為呢個地方唔係豪宅地段,睇真啲,確係很少香港人住在那裡.全都是大陸人,我們住的話要學國語才能互相聯繫!

如果可以令那些大陸資金去買新界就好啦,在此希望地產代理朋友們,你們本著良知,幫幫本地新界人一把,帶大陸人來新界買樓啦,這些同胞都係听你地帶路嘅,反正他們大把錢,買邊度都無所謂啦!

國內同胞買邊度,邊度樓價就升,幫我們呢班97年買樓嘅新界人脫苦海!

成班人都唔知 醜 字點寫

自己唔自強不息想辦法解困，

口口聲聲等 大陸佬 買起個市，日後點抬得起頭做人