Politican is irresponsible, they shout , shout , shout every day for their vote, for their interest, for their political value, for their grass root support.

Apart from asking gov to give money , what they had done to HK to make it competitive ?

說得對,說得好正確.我不想再是負資產.

80後 90後不要再妄想不勞而獲

坐艇坐足14年的滋味只有過來人才感受得到

大陸的樓價也很貴,以大陸人的工資平均每月1千多來算,樓價比香港貴很多,要置業在國內更難!

如果擁有香港樓,實在很好,樓不只是用來住,樓可以加按拿取現金,可以在銀行抵押做OD或生意上的貸款,好多中小企都係用樓抵押俾銀行做生意.

所以香港樓已不只是用來自住,它是有多用途功能,這一點,好多年青人不知道.

同意蔡生言論,非常正確,港人買咗樓,自是想樓價升,如果說只用來自住,那是風涼說話,樓價升身家膨脹,人的地位就高.

需要錢週轉時,不用賣樓變現,隨時都可拿層樓去加按好多現金出來,真係太美妙了,有錢真係大不同!

蔡志忠文章好有見地,擁有正確人生觀,令人眼界大開,香港地有很多有能之士,政府應多些向這些有識之士請教房屋政策.

當人大了,有了家庭小孩,父母的家根本不足夠,基本是住,,買了樓,真的是用來自住,不一定是用來說風涼話

如不乞選票,不從政,可以說出真說話,分析中肯. 班無能組別乞票議員, 為求乞選票,比政府更長短視.

炒家已改名成投資者........前後者大致上冇分別.

問心一句: 樓價係要下跌!

聽人講，有位人兄，愛說服人家同意佢觀點角度，用親要用幾十分鐘時間，你唔同意佢，佢就繼續游說你哦你，日哦夜哦，假設你在几十分鐘後投降，佢就話佢說服力勁，條粉角係邊個？

宜家香港樓唔係只用來自住,樓已是一種商品,係投資工具,香港只得金融和地產可作投資,金融股票係好高深好難,咁買樓便較為容易.

在大陸有咁多工業,農業等可以發展,人民都買樓來當投資保值,何況香港,沒有很多行業供投資選擇,唔買樓銀紙一定大貶值,對勤力嘅港人最蝕底.

未買樓者,應去買新界樓,因為有些樓仲比深圳平.

如果要果班覺得樓價貴，要打壓樓價既 區議員，立法會議員，

先將自己住既樓拿出來“平賣”比D市民大眾，幫下小市民上車。

雖是單位數量有限，杯水車薪，但都幫得幾多算幾多啊...

唔知渠地會點回答呢個問題呢？

而家買左樓既人 系用真金白銀買樓既；買左樓既人 系冒加息，樓價大跌等風險買樓既；

有能力買樓但又未買既人 有好多都系自己唔願意承擔風險而錯過買樓時機，要怪就應該怪渠地自己驚頭縮尾，驚樓價大跌，驚息率大升，呢D人 點幫得落啊？

即使第二日幫呢班人上左車，如果樓價大跌，渠地肯定系第一個走出來嘈啦

系自由社會，沒啊公照顧。自己要為自己行為負責。

驚樓價跌就唔好買，等渠跌先再買咯；唔怕樓價跌、加息既就買啦，

唔系三歲細佬哥，做左決定就要自己承擔後果，唔好好似三歲細佬哥，又奈呢樣又奈果樣

股市都比之前升左好多好多，

好多隻股票都比之前升左幾百%；樓價就系升幾十%；

樓價影響市民生活，股價升到甘高，就唔影響 “未平買股票”既市民生活咩？！

果班要政府打壓樓價既 神棍政客，唔乖你地都 要去遊行，都要 要求政府好似啊爺甘去打壓股市！！！

Mr Choi article is more close to the fact, and most of time quite accurate and to the point like low interest rate + Money from Mainland + HK$ depreciation are the root cause.

Unlike Wong MY who always make his own great predictions, and unfortunately almost all of them are wrong and make mistakes many times, still dare to write something stupid like people from Mainland can buy HK property because they borrowed money in China bank which is really ridiculous (he thought China people is as poor as 40 years ago).

He also predicted the HK property has very huge bubble that will burst very soon. And his so called bubble is always using the average salary level of HK citizens as the only consideration factor, while always ignoring the fundamental economic principle of supply & demand. The fact is that the lack of land supply from HK gov, and demand keep on increasing from the citizens of Mainland + demand to against HK$ depreciation. This simple and easy theory he did not know.  

This MY Wong is trying to delete others comments which are against him.

在香港賺到家庭月收入HK$５萬至10萬,都只是住大約一千呎單位(或更細), 相比外國, HK$400萬巳可以買到不錯的獨立屋; 真是身為香港人的悲哀, :(

香港有55.8萬個百萬富翁擁有資產平均980萬(現金+房產和股票等),其中擁有房地產比例佔29%,反觀金融海嘯時,經濟轉差樓價大跌,香港人身家大縮水,港人並不開心.

宜家多數嘅港人因持有物業身家膨脹,地位愈來愈高,反對高樓價,令樓市向下,身家大減並非多數港人意願!所以話反對派搞亂和搞衰香港唔會得到廣大市民支持!

http://www.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/index.html

右邊小窗窗

香港真係一片福地,有咁多百萬富翁,樓價平穩上升對勤奮嘅香港人真係一件好事,如果好似日本咁發生地震海嘯,那就很悲哀.

奉勸反對派唔好成日搞亂檔,香港需要穩定和諧,市民睇唔到泛民有何能力可以領導香港走向更好,我們唔要暴力抗爭,呢度唔係埃及,請你哋回頭是岸,唔好教壞年青人.

宜家如果同班80,90後話搞返個文化大革命或平分身家，佢哋可能會agree.

大陸越黎越資本主義，香港越黎越福利及共產主義。呢D係我過去咁多年往返大陸出差公幹既真實感受到嘅!

議員應該以民為本，並不是拿市民來威逼政府，政治動盪真是為市民好嗎？

真正為市民好，應該要為香港長遠發展才對，只顧眼前利息的議員，醒來吧！

唔好教壞下一代，積返一點福吧！

never believe property agents